Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 23.01.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> 
>> Hi Paolo !
>> 
>> Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:
>> 
>>  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg08503.html
>> 
>> but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
>> you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
>> the patch takes effect?
> 
> I found this with QEMU.  You need to test with an inline function which
> has attributes with arguments.

Ah, mostly about QEMU .. OK now I see also a small effect on kernel's source:

  https://github.com/return42/sphkerneldoc/commit/cecfe275

Sorry for the noise.

-- Markus --

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux