Hi Mark, On 01/11/2017 01:45 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:40:42PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: >> On 01/11/2017 12:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> The name, as it is, is perfectly descriptive. >>> >>> Let's not sacrifice legibility over a non-issue. >> >> I don't want to kick a dead horse or anything, but changing it to >> QCOM_FLKR_ERRATUM_1003 would eliminate all the spacing problems >> without sacrificing anything. > > The CPU is called "Falkor", not "FLKR", and we're not coming up with an > ACPI table name... > > The ARM Ltd. erratum numbers are global to all parts, so we don't > include the part name. Is the 1003 erratum number specific to Falkor? > > If it's global, you could use QCOM_ERRATUM_1003 instead. E1003 is specific to Falkor, and hopefully just its first major revision. Qualcomm Technology's first/previous generation ARMv8 custom microarchitecture used errata numbers below 1000. I am not aware of global coordination in the numbering, unfortunately. > Otherwise, QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003 is preferable. Thanks, Cov -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
