Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/06/2017 10:02 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:55:03 -0800

Actually, that reminds me...  How does your code interface with ksm?  Or
is there no interaction needed since you're always working on virtual
addresses?

This reminds me, I consider this feature potentially extremely useful for
kernel debugging.  So I would like to make sure we don't implement anything
in a way which would preclude that in the long term.

I agree and please do point out if I have made any implementation decisions that could preclude that.

Thanks,
Khalid

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux