Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Conversion crypto API documentation to Sphinx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 23:06:14 +0100
Stephan Müller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am sorry, then I may have misunderstood you.
> 
> I would think that Herbert agreed that you push the entire patch set through 
> your tree, including the documentation changes to the crypto header files.
> 
> I just did a patch on the parts that touch the crypto header files. All apply 
> cleanly except patch 07/08 which has a 5 line hunk due to other changes, Is 
> that hunk ok for you, it would be great if you could take it. If you do not 
> like that hunk, we could push it through the cryptodev tree once rc-1 is out.

Clearly there was a bit of misunderstanding going around :)

I've applied the patch set to docs-next.  Oddly I had no trouble with #7,
but #2 was badly mailer-mangled and took some work.  

Anyway, it should make its way into linux-next; if there's no fireworks,
I'll endeavor to send it Linusward in time to avoid interfering with his
kitchen duties.

Sorry for the confusion,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux