Re: [RFC 02/10] module: fix memory leak on early load_module() failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> While looking for early possible module loading failures I was
>>> able to reproduce a memory leak possible with kmemleak. There
>>> are a few rare ways to trigger a failure:
>>>
>>>   o we've run into a failure while processing kernel parameters
>>>     (parse_args() returns an error)
>>>   o mod_sysfs_setup() fails
>>>   o we're a live patch module and copy_module_elf() fails
>>>
>>> Chances of running into this issue is really low.
>>>
>>> kmemleak splat:
>>>
>>> unreferenced object 0xffff9f2c4ada1b00 (size 32):
>>>   comm "kworker/u16:4", pid 82, jiffies 4294897636 (age 681.816s)
>>>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>>     6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  memstick0.......
>>>     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>>   backtrace:
>>>     [<ffffffff8c6cfeba>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0
>>>     [<ffffffff8c200046>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x126/0x230
>>>     [<ffffffff8c1bc581>] kstrdup+0x31/0x60
>>>     [<ffffffff8c1bc5d4>] kstrdup_const+0x24/0x30
>>>     [<ffffffff8c3c23aa>] kvasprintf_const+0x7a/0x90
>>>     [<ffffffff8c3b5481>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x21/0x90
>>>     [<ffffffff8c4fbdd7>] dev_set_name+0x47/0x50
>>>     [<ffffffffc07819e5>] memstick_check+0x95/0x33c [memstick]
>>>     [<ffffffff8c09c893>] process_one_work+0x1f3/0x4b0
>>>     [<ffffffff8c09cb98>] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
>>>     [<ffffffff8c0a2b79>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
>>>     [<ffffffff8c6dab5f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
>>>     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Is this worth sending through -stable too?
>
> Yes, for some reason git-send e-mail complained to me about
> stable@xxxxxxxxxx not being a valid local address, so I had to remove
> it, but indeed. I'll try to fix this e-mail issue later and add your
> tag.

Yup, you want stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux