Re: [RFC 04/10] kmod: provide wrappers for kmod_concurrent inc/dec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:29:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > kmod_concurrent is used as an atomic counter for enabling
> > the allowed limit of modprobe calls, provide wrappers for it
> > to enable this to be expanded on more easily. This will be done
> > later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/kmod.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
> > index cb6f7ca7b8a5..049d7eabda38 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kmod.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kmod.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> >  #include <trace/events/module.h>
> >
> >  extern int max_threads;
> > +
> > +static atomic_t kmod_concurrent = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > +
> >  unsigned int max_modprobes;
> >  module_param(max_modprobes, uint, 0644);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_modprobes, "Max number of allowed concurrent modprobes");
> > @@ -108,6 +111,20 @@ static int call_modprobe(char *module_name, int wait)
> >         return -ENOMEM;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int kmod_umh_threads_get(void)
> > +{
> > +       atomic_inc(&kmod_concurrent);
> > +       if (atomic_read(&kmod_concurrent) < max_modprobes)
> > +               return 0;
> > +       atomic_dec(&kmod_concurrent);
> > +       return -ENOMEM;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void kmod_umh_threads_put(void)
> > +{
> > +       atomic_dec(&kmod_concurrent);
> > +}
> 
> Can you use a kref here instead? We're trying to kill raw use of
> atomic_t for reference counting...

That's a much broader functional change than I was looking for, but I am up for
it. Can you describe the benefit of using kref you expect or why this is an
ongoing crusade? Since its a larger functional change how about doing this
change later, and we can test impact with the tress test driver. In theory if
there are benefits can't we add a test case to prove the gains?

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux