On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 22:58:14 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not a fan of this. The atomic_ops.txt file needs a lot of love, and I > wouldn't want to edit a .rst file. > > Then again, I probably won't actually get around to fixing this document > any time soon either. > > But if and when I would get around to it, I'll have to change it back to > a regular .txt file. Peter, could you please describe what the trouble with RST is? Most of the files in Documentation/ are already almost in RST format; should we change them to something else? :) Silvio, one thing that might help would be to redo the patch with a minimum of changes and, in particular, a minimum of unnecessary markup. Yes, it's better to put literal strings in monospace, but we don't have to, and getting rid of a lot of ``funny quotes`` makes the changes a lot less intrusive. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
