On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 18:00 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > + } > > > +#endif > > > + > > > > NAK. If this code is going to exist, it needs to be deeply buried > in > > some unlikely if statement that already exists. There's no good > > reason to penalize all context switches to support some nonsensical > > vm86 use case. > > Agreed, now if instead vm86 get to emulate these instructions, this > all > magically goes away.. Yes. I agree. I will rework the series and this should not be needed. Thanks and BR, Ricardo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
