> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide > > implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is > > accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security protocol > > out commands with UFS specific parameters. This multi step process is > > abstracted into 4 basic RPMB commands. > > This is a giant layering violation - the security protocol is not something up to > the LLDD but the core code. > > And honestly the idea of defintining a security protocol in the UFS spec is just > as braindead. If you care about this please take it up with T10 to get RPMB > support into one of the core SCSI specs instead of a transport. I value your opinion but I'm not responsible for inventing RPMB and/or its implementation storage devices (eMMC, UFC, NVMe), it's pretty much done deal out there in the wild. I'm just trying to provide common API above it. Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
