On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:52:46 +0300 > Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I was looking at Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt and figured that >> has got to be constantly stale and incomplete. It's really data that >> should be autogenerated. I don't think it should just be converted to >> Sphinx as-is. > > So this hasn't gotten a whole lot of response, so I figure I ought to say > something... I agree that it would be a good thing to automate the > creation of this information. That, of course, requires that somebody do > the work to actually make that happen... I was hoping on some feedback on the approaches themselves... but I guess that'd first require patches people could then vehemently oppose. :p > In the meantime, I did go ahead > and apply Mauro's conversion to Sphinx because I didn't see the harm in > doing so - it doesn't block the addition of a better solution once we get > around to making one. Mauro's conversion that just puts all the parameter descriptions into a preformatted text block seems fine; I did intend to say it's not worth the effort to go through it all and manually convert to some nice formatting. (Of course, that is not at all what I wrote. [1]) BR, Jani. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiio%27s_laws -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html