On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 01:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > IMO what we need is to go through all rules in CodingStyle and if for > > some rule there is no overwhelming majority in the core kernel, well, > > the list has grown way too large and could use massive trimming. > > I'm in complete agreement. > > I also think that checkpatch's ERROR/WARNING/CHECK message naming is > far too severe and injunctive and could use a renaming to something > more silly, bug related and less commanding like FLEAS/GNATS/NITS. I think it is better to be clear. CHECK was never really clear to me, especially if you see it in isolation, on a file that doesn't also have ERROR or WARNING. NITS is a common word in this context, but not FLEAS and GNATS, as far as I know. There could also be a severity level: high medium and low. julia > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
