On Monday, September 12, 2016 11:15:45 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, September 12, 2016 06:14:44 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:01:58PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > > On 9/7/2016 5:11 PM, Francis Giraldeau wrote: > > > >When running only the test_jitter(), the isolation mode is lost: > > > > > > > > [ 6741.566048] isolation/9515: task_isolation mode lost due to irq_work > > > > > > > >With ftrace (events/workqueue/workqueue_execute_start), I get a bit more info: > > > > > > > > kworker/1:1-676 [001] .... 6610.097128: workqueue_execute_start: work struct ffff8801a784ca20: function dbs_work_handler > > > > > > > >The governor was ondemand, so I tried to set the frequency scaling > > > >governor to performance, but that does not solve the issue. Is there > > > >a way to suppress this irq_work? Should we run the isolated task with > > > >high real-time priority, such that it never get preempted? > > > > > > On the tile platform we don't have the frequency scaling stuff to contend with, so > > > I don't know much about it. I'd be very curious to know what you can figure out > > > on this front. > > > > Rafael, I'm thinking the performance governor should be able to run > > without sending IPIs. Is there anything we can quickly do about that? > > The performance governor doesn't do any IPIs. > > At this point I'm not sure what's going on. I've just tried and switching over to the performance governor makes dbs_work_handler go away for me (w/ -rc4 with some extra irrelevant patches on top) as it should. What doesn't work, in particular? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
