Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/09/2016 12:23 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:37:49PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> This patch adds support to be change the memory encryption attribute for
>> one or more memory pages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/cacheflush.h  |    3 +
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h |   13 ++++++
>>  arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c          |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c             |   75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
>> index 72c292d..0ba9382 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
>> @@ -1728,6 +1728,81 @@ int set_memory_4k(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>>  					__pgprot(0), 1, 0, NULL);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int __set_memory_enc_dec(struct cpa_data *cpa)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long addr;
>> +	int numpages;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (*cpa->vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK) {
>> +		*cpa->vaddr &= PAGE_MASK;
>> +
>> +		/* People should not be passing in unaligned addresses */
>> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> 
> Let's make this more user-friendly:
> 
> 	if (WARN_ONCE(*cpa->vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK, "Misaligned address: 0x%lx\n", *cpa->vaddr))
> 		*cpa->vaddr &= PAGE_MASK;

Will do.

> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	addr = *cpa->vaddr;
>> +	numpages = cpa->numpages;
>> +
>> +	/* Must avoid aliasing mappings in the highmem code */
>> +	kmap_flush_unused();
>> +	vm_unmap_aliases();
>> +
>> +	ret = __change_page_attr_set_clr(cpa, 1);
>> +
>> +	/* Check whether we really changed something */
>> +	if (!(cpa->flags & CPA_FLUSHTLB))
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * On success we use CLFLUSH, when the CPU supports it to
>> +	 * avoid the WBINVD.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!ret && static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
>> +		cpa_flush_range(addr, numpages, 1);
>> +	else
>> +		cpa_flush_all(1);
> 
> So if we fail (ret != 0) we do WBINVD unconditionally even if we don't
> have to?

Looking at __change_page_attr_set_clr() isn't it possible for some of
the pages to be changed before an error is encountered since it is
looping?  If so, we may still need to flush. The CPA_FLUSHTLB flag
should take care of a failing case where no attributes have actually
been changed.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Don't you want this instead:
> 
>         ret = __change_page_attr_set_clr(cpa, 1);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto out;
> 
>         /* Check whether we really changed something */
>         if (!(cpa->flags & CPA_FLUSHTLB))
>                 goto out;
> 
>         /*
>          * On success we use CLFLUSH, when the CPU supports it to
>          * avoid the WBINVD.
>          */
>         if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
>                 cpa_flush_range(addr, numpages, 1);
>         else
>                 cpa_flush_all(1);
> 
> out:
>         return ret;
> }
> 
> ?
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux