On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 08:37:23PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: >> Did you get a chance to review the series? > > We need to decide on fundamental question before reviewing it, which is > "how to fit rdmacg to new ABI model". >From last discussion with Matan in this email thread, it appears that - only broken case are: (a) HW vendor driver specific resources (if they have crazy big list), which cannot be abstracted out well enough, won't be controlled by rdma cgroup. (b) Such resource objects are not well defined today with new ABI model. If such objects are well defined today, lets call them out and discuss with Doug, Tejun, Christoph and larger group, whether they qualify for inclusion or not. rdma cgroup currently supports including handful of HW resource that can be abstracted (at least at functionality level). Please include any other option issue, if any. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
