> My claim was not that the mainline code was impressively perfect, but > rather that the vendor code was worse, countering a prior claim > otherwise. Hence, reality. You're arguing with a straw man. I was responding to a comment about out-of-tree code, not generic architecture perf drivers vs. alternative versions by SoC vendors. Qualcomm and other vendors landing their drivers in mainline would be nice, but it wouldn't make it inherently higher quality. I don't really see what it has to do with this, which I why I responded...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
