Hi Benjamin,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 04:53:50PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> +
> +struct mapping_table_entry {
> + u16 rmiaddr;
Should be __le16 rmiaddr, otherwise:
CHECK drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:116:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:116:33: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] rmiaddr
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:116:33: got restricted __le16 [usertype] <noident>
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver rmi_smb_driver;
> +
I do not think this forward declaration is needed.
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int rmi_smb_suspend(struct device *dev)
__maybe_unused instead of #ifdef.
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rmi_driver_suspend(rmi_smb->xport.rmi_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to suspend device: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int rmi_smb_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
Same here?
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rmi_driver_suspend(rmi_smb->xport.rmi_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to suspend device: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_smb_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rmi_driver_resume(rmi_smb->xport.rmi_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to resume device: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops rmi_smb_pm = {
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(rmi_smb_suspend, NULL)
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(rmi_smb_runtime_suspend, rmi_smb_runtime_resume,
> + NULL)
> +};
> +
> +static int rmi_smb_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = container_of(dev, struct i2c_client, dev);
> + struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct rmi_device *rmi_dev = rmi_smb->xport.rmi_dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rmi_smb_reset(&rmi_smb->xport, 0);
> +
> + rmi_reset(rmi_dev);
> +
> + ret = rmi_driver_resume(rmi_smb->xport.rmi_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to resume device: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id rmi_id[] = {
> + { "rmi4_smbus", 0 },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, rmi_id);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver rmi_smb_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .name = "rmi4_smbus",
> + .pm = &rmi_smb_pm,
> + .resume = rmi_smb_resume,
Why rmi_smb_resume is not part of rmi_smb_pm?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
