On June 23, 2016 10:30:34 AM EDT, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:43:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote: >> From: Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> swiotlb default size of 64M is too big as >> default value therefore it is made configurable >> through command line through swiotlb_size parameter. >> swiotlb allocation shall be done only when the >> swiotlb size is given through command line. >> Otherwise no swiotlb is allocated. > >I already queued this patch: > >http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1465372426-4077-1-git-send-email-jszhang@xxxxxxxxxxx > >If you have any objections to it, please reply there. I do (sorry about duplicate email, the other got rejected by mailing lists). Why not expand the swiotlb= parameter instead of introducing a new one? Also, why not use the swiotlb by itself? That does the job as well? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
