On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:34:59 PM CEST Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> @@ -78,9 +79,9 @@ > >> > >> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > >> #define TASK_SIZE_32 UL(0x100000000) > >> -#define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > >> +#define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? \ > >> TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > >> -#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \ > >> +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_thread(tsk) ? \ > > It should be > > +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk)) ? \ > > is_compat_thread takes "struct thread_info *thread" while TASK_SIZE_OF takes > > "struct task_struct *tsk"tsk. > > If that doesn't throw an error does that mean that TASK_SIZE_OF is > unused? I think that is correct. On some architectures, TASK_SIZE (which is used) is defined as TASK_SIZE_OF(current), but the definition above doesn't do that and there are no other users. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
