On Jun 16 2016 or thereabouts, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > - removed the .resume hook as upstream changed suspend/resume hooks and there > > > is no need in the end to re-enable host notify on resume (tested on Lenovo > > > t440 and t450). > > > > Actually, this hook seemed to be required on the Lenovo T440 (Haswell) > > but not on the T450 (Broadwell) laptop I have now here. > > > > Wolfram, I can resend the whole series or a follow-up patch to re-enable > > after resume Host Notify. How do you prefer I deal with that? > > That depends a little how we want to handle patch 4. I am going to apply > patches 1+2 today to my tree. Then you can just resend patch 3 which I > hope will get some review soon, but I will pick it up for 4.8 later > nonetheless. If it is not causing too much dependency hassle, I'd prefer > that patch 4 goes via Dmitry's input tree. > Works for me. Thanks for picking up the core changes. As soon as this gets merged, the input part (patch 4), which is independent of patch 3 (i2c-i801) can be carried over through the input tree. So as long as you don't need to have a new feature without users for a short period of time, that's fine by me :) Cheers, Benjamin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
