On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:49:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Do we not expect the number of argument to grow ? This "cleanup" would > do away with such possibilities, and then require adding the API later, > and this requiring a full set of collateral evolutions again when this > is needed. What was the original motivation for using this instead of > the approach you are suggesting ? We still got plenty of space for attrs. If you're worried about running out of 32 flags we could do a dma_attrs_t typedef that we could swich to a u64. That would have another advantage in that we could add a __bitwise sparse annotation to avoid people passing the wrong kind of flags. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
