Am 07.06.2016 um 08:44 schrieb Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I looked closer to rst2pdf, it supports only the docutils reST, but >> not the sphinx superset ... >> >> <SNIP rst2pdf>------------- >> $ rst2pdf index.rst >> index.rst:15: (ERROR/3) Unknown interpreted text role "ref". >> index.rst:15: (ERROR/3) Unknown interpreted text role "ref". >> index.rst:27: (ERROR/3) Unknown directive type "toctree". > > This doesn't actually happen if you run rst2pdf through Sphinx. > Aaah, thanks for hinting. With this in mind, I think rst2pdf is a good choice and the minor bugs in could be handled. In the long term a XeTeX builder as an alternative to produce layouts with higher quality would be nice. I (also) added rst2pdf: https://github.com/return42/linux/commit/d88c4981f86fed85e54ee4d4955b35eb9eaac063 -- M -- >> .. toctree:: >> :maxdepth: 1 >> >> kernel-doc-intro >> kernel-doc-syntax >> <SNAP>------------- >> >> >> rules like ":ref:", domains like ":c:type:" and directives like ".. toctree:" >> are a part of the (extended) reST syntax from sphinx, thats why >> standard docutils (like rst2*) will not work ... > > You will get warnings like > > [WARNING] styles.py:548 Using undefined style 'function', aliased to style 'normal'. > [WARNING] styles.py:548 Using undefined style 'type', aliased to style 'normal'. > > but it's a matter of defining a custom rst2pdf stylesheet. It's json > with a sort of inheritance model, so it should be easy to just extend > the existing stylesheet. > > BR, > Jani. > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
