Re: [PATCH 18/23] arm64: ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:04:47 AM CEST Yury Norov wrote:
> +static unsigned long compat_sys_mmap2(compat_uptr_t addr, compat_size_t len,
> +       int prot, int flags, int fd, off_t pgoff)
> +{
> +       if (pgoff & (~PAGE_MASK >> 12))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       return sys_mmap_pgoff(addr, len, prot, flags, fd,
> +                      pgoff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long compat_sys_pread64(unsigned int fd,
> +               compat_uptr_t __user *ubuf, compat_size_t count, off_t offset)
> +{
> +       return sys_pread64(fd, (char *) ubuf, count, offset);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long compat_sys_pwrite64(unsigned int fd,
> +               compat_uptr_t __user *ubuf, compat_size_t count, off_t offset)
> +{
> +       return sys_pwrite64(fd, (char *) ubuf, count, offset);
> +}
> 

The use of compat_uptr_t seems inconsistent here, and neither of the two
ways of doing it is what we do elsewhere. compat_uptr_t is meant to
be a scalar 32-bit type that gets converted into a pointer using the
compat_ptr() macro, so compat_sys_mmap2 should not use compat_ptr_t
(we don't access it as a pointer in mmap_pgoff) but compat_ulong_t,
and compat_sys_pread64() should have a compat_uptr_t argument, not
pointer to compat_uptr_t.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux