On 05/06/2016 04:46 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: (...) >> Well, I'm not sure if any configfs interface has been proposed as easy >> to use from cmd line. I think they all has been proposed as *usable* >> from cmd line but not necessarily *easy to use*. >> >> That's why most of configfs clients has some support in userspace. For >> example for target there is a taget-cli and for usb gadget we have >> libusbg/libusbgx. >> > Glade to know this tool, it is much more easy to use than interact with sysfs. > I'd like use it. Just see you are the main contributor of this project. :) > That's true;) personally I would recommend you using libusbgx[1] instead of libusbg[2] as it is far more recent and usable (292 commits vs 128;) ) (...) >> >> What do you mean pseudo 'busy'? If we do: >> >> echo <udc-name> > UDC >> > Sorry, please ignore this. I find if no UDC available, the config will be queued > to a list, and will bind it when a UDC module install. So it is really busy. > >> then gadget should be really bound to some udc and potentially really busy. >> >>> In a word, this patch is just an improvement, not to fix any issues or >>> add new function. >> >> So it doesn't add any new functionality and breaks existing user space >> tools. >> Yes, currently it's true but it's a bug which I have fixed yesterday[3] Footnotes: 1 - https://github.com/libusbgx/libusbgx 2 - https://github.com/libusbg/libusbg 3 - http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=146243801207458&w=2 Cheers, -- Krzysztof Opasiak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
