On Friday 22 April 2016 17:51:30 Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:08:40AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_ilp32.c > > [...] > > > +#include "../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c" > > How different is this new binfmt_ilp32.c file from the first part of > compat_binfmt_elf.c? I wonder whether we could include the latter here > instead and make this similar to binfmt_elf32.c introduced by the > previous patch. That is how the earlier versions did it, and I thought it ended up too ugly with lots of runtime checks instead of compile-time checks. The current version is how I asked it to be done. A slight variation would be to keep using fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c for one of the two compat modes (today it is used for aarch32) and have a separate file include "../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c" for the other mode (as this patch does for ilp32). I think that is what I asked for, but there was probably a good reason for having two files in the same directory. The result is basically the same. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
