On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:18:47PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > There aren't any (beyond the usual references to the Wolfson datasheets > > which I'd suggest should be in here) but that doesn't mean we should > > ignore this spec when we have it. > This is exactly the problem. For an outsider, it's impossible to know that > wolfson has the correct definition of the modes. Why should wolfson datasheets > trumph nxp or ti datasheets (or whatever), if there is an inconsistency? I'm not quite sure what your concern is here? I'm saying that where there are specs we should link to them. I'm not saying we can't add to that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
