On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:16:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:26PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > pwm->period field is not supposed to be changed by PWM users. The only > > > > ones authorized to change it are the PWM core and PWM drivers. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 3 +-- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Applied? > > You didn't specifically Ack this one, but I presumed that since the > change is essentially the same as for pwm-backlight, and this is another > prerequisite for the remainder of the series it should go in through the > PWM tree as well. If you're taking Backlight patches through a !Backlight tree, you're going to have to send out a pull-request. There are no conflicts currently, so I won't use it right away, but I need it in my arsenal if they do occur. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
