Hi Lee,
Thanks for review.
I will send another patch with incorporating your comments.
On Thursday 07 April 2016 04:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
+ if (!ret) {
+ *ptr = dev;
+ devres_add(dev, ptr);
+ } else {
+ devres_free(ptr);
+ }
Switch these round. If you encounter a problem, free and return. If
not, skip the error handling and add the device outside of the if().
Like below?
if (ret) {
devres_free(ptr);
return ret;
}
*ptr = dev;
devres_add(dev, ptr);
return ret;
+ * Remove all mfd devices added on the device.
s/mfd/MFD/
'D' already means devices, so here you are saying "devices devices".
Please re-word. Besides, you need to be more specific as to which
"devices on the devices" you are detailing, since this sentence
doesn't really make a great deal of sense.
Wanted to say
Remove all devices added by mfd_add_devices() from parent device.
+ * Normally this function will not need to be called and the resource
+ * management code will ensure that the resource is freed.
Then what is the purpose of providing it? Do you have a user?
To have pair of release. I have not seen the usage of most of
devm_*_release() function other than devm_kfree().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
