Re: [PATCH] Syntactic and factual errors in the API document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I thought that _was_ the current kernel (not the obsolete one our chip vendor supports).

Which one do you mean by current? (URL & commit ID would be great!)

Andy
________________________________________
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 31 March 2016 07:43
To: Champ, Andy
Cc: edubezval@xxxxxxxxx; javi.merino@xxxxxxx; durgadoss.r@xxxxxxxxx; leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx; kapileshwar.singh@xxxxxxx; wni@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Syntactic and factual errors in the API document

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:37:25 +0000
Andy Champ <andycham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are several places where the English in the document is syntactically
> invalid, or unclear. There are also one or two factual errors.

I went to apply this one to the docs tree, but it no longer applies to
current kernels.  Any chance of getting a respin?

Thanks,

jon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux