Em Tue, 08 Mar 2016 05:13:13 -0700 Dan Allen <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab < > mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > pandoc did a really crap job on the conversion. To convert this > > into something useful, we'll need to spend a lot of time, as it lost > > most of the cross-references, as they were defined via DocBook macros. > > > > I agree pandoc creates crappy AsciiDoc. We have a much better converter in > the works called DocBookRx. > > https://github.com/opendevise/docbookrx > > It has converted several very serious DocBook documents and we're > continuing to improve it. It's also a lot easier to hack than pandoc. Didn't work: $ ./bin/docbookrx ~/devel/docbook_test/v4l2.xml No visitor defined for <part>! Skipping. No visitor defined for <part>! Skipping. No visitor defined for <part>! Skipping. No visitor defined for <part>! Skipping. No visitor defined for <appendixinfo>! Skipping. > > -Dan > > -- Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
