Hi Ramesh,
On 08.03.2016 09:57, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote:
As you mentioned further down, when a user does this
"ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 1000000"
the intention is to put the controller in CAN 2.0 mode. Even if we use a status flag or copy the data bitrate equal to the nominal bitrate, what would it achieve? It still cannot be a CAN 2.0 node - it is a CAN FD node configured with same nominal & data bitrate.
This is why I have this check in ndo_open, so that the user is aware it is a CAN FD node always and avoid misconfiguration like above with EOPNOTSUPP.
ok - got it now.
In fact you provided a CAN driver which is "CAN-FD-only".
We did not had that before but there's a solution for this kind of setup.
There is a similar case with CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO we had on the M_CAN
driver which only provides non-ISO configuration for the supported IP core and
_no_ option to _change_ this value:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6cfda7fbebe8a4fd33ea5722fa0212f98f643c35
If you would do it similar in rcar_canfd.c with
/* CAN_CTRLMODE_FD is fixed with R-Car CAN FD */
priv->can.ctrlmode = CAN_CTRLMODE_FD;
and remove CAN_CTRLMODE_FD from the priv->can.ctrlmode_supported assignment
then it should do the entire configuration process correctly for you.
Including the proper tests for the two bitrates.
(see open_candev() in linux/drivers/net/can/dev.c)
Right?
Best regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
