On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:23:50PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:34:12PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > > diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls_structs.h b/include/linux/syscalls_structs.h > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..a920cbc > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/include/linux/syscalls_structs.h > > > @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ > > > +#ifndef _LINUX_SYSCALL_STRUCTS_H > > > +#define _LINUX_SYSCALL_STRUCTS_H > > > + > > > +struct epoll_event; > > > +struct iattr; > > > +struct inode; > > > +struct iocb; > > > +struct io_event; > > > +struct iovec; > > > +struct itimerspec; > > > +struct itimerval; > > > > This is not needed for s390, right? So might be worth a separate patch > > which moves the forward declarations? > > This patch also introduces __SC_WRAP, not needed as well. The idea of > this patch is to introduce all the tricky machinery at once. If you > think we need split it, I'm OK, but maybe it's enough to add more > detailed description... What do you think? Ok, I see. Then the only change I'd like to request is to update the comment in front of the COMPAT_SYSCALL_WRAPx macro which talks about 33/31 bit pointer sizes. This doesn't make too much sense for common code :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
