Hi
On 5 February 2016 at 00:46, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 08:37 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>>
>> Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +static int sbsa_gwdt_keepalive(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>>> >+{
>>>> >+ struct sbsa_gwdt *gwdt = to_sbsa_gwdt(wdd);
>>>> >+
>>>> >+ /*
>>>> >+ * Writing WRR for an explicit watchdog refresh.
>>>> >+ * You can write anyting(like 0xc0ffee).
>>>> >+ */
>>>> >+ writel(0xc0ffee, gwdt->refresh_base + SBSA_GWDT_WRR);
>>>> >+
>>>> >+ return 0;
>>>> >+}
>>>
>>> You might get in trouble for that. 0xd09f00d is probably less poisonous.
>>>
>>> http://www.petpoisonhelpline.com/poison/caffeine/
>>
>>
>> Any reason why we can't just keep it simple and write 0?
>
>
> +1
yes, we can, just "0" would be fine, will do.
Thanks :-)
>
> Guenter
>
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
