Fu Wei wrote:
sorry, are you saying : using pre-timeout instead of this half timeout?
But even we have pre-timeout support, pre-timeout == timeout / 2, it
can not be configured without touch timeout.
if you want pre-timeout != timeout / 2, we have to modify WCV in the
interrupt routine.
(because of the explicit watchdog refresh mechanism)
Could you let me know why we need pre-timeout here ??:-)
What I meant was that if we had full-blown pre-timeout support in the
watchdog layer, then you could use that to implement the
panic-on-half-timeout feature.
When pre-timeout is implemented, will you modify the interrupt handler
to use it?
>belong upstream. But like I said, it's just my opinion, and I won't
>complain if I'm outvoted.
I think this debugging feature is the purpose of the two-stage
watchdog, if I understand correctly
Hmmm... that make sense. I think maybe you should drop the Kconfig
option, and just have "static bool panic_enabled = false;" Also, then
do this:
if (panic_enabled) {
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sbsa_gwdt_interrupt, 0,
pdev->name, gwdt);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "unable to request IRQ %d\n", irq);
return ret;
}
}
That way, the interrupt handler is never registered if the command-line
parameter is not specified.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
