Em Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:08:21AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: > On 25 January 2016 at 14:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:12:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > >> Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:46:22PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: > >> > On 14 January 2016 at 14:46, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > I can't queue this patch for 4.6 without at least a reviewed by from you. > >> > >> This one I remember, looks ugly, the name set_max_cpu_num() looks > >> strange, when that was restricted (static) to that cpumap.c file, it > >> wasn't a problem, exporting it for wider usage looks bad. > >> > >> You've been waiting for this for quite a while, it seems, lemme stop > >> what I am doing to check this... > > > > So, please check the patch below, what you need then is just to use > > cpu__max_cpu(). > > I like your approach - thanks for the review. I will spin V9 when I > have received Adrian's comments. I'll take that as an Acked-by: and since this improves the current situation by hiding needlessly exported global variables, I'll get it in now, thanks. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
