Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] watchdog: Introduce hardware maximum timeout in watchdog core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Uwe,

On 11/24/2015 08:11 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Guenter,

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:03:13AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
thanks a lot for the Ack. I have v6 in the works, which changes recording
of last_keepalive when the watchdog is started. Does your Ack include that
change, or do you prefer to have another look ?

this change is to sample jiffies before .start is called as I suggested,
right? For that change keeping my ack is ok of course.


Correct. This is how the code now looks like.

        started_at = jiffies;
        if (watchdog_hw_running(wdd) && wdd->ops->ping)
                err = wdd->ops->ping(wdd);
        else
                err = wdd->ops->start(wdd);
        if (err == 0) {
                set_bit(WDOG_ACTIVE, &wdd->status);
                wdd->last_keepalive = started_at;
                watchdog_update_worker(wdd);
        }

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux