Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] watchdog: Introduce WDOG_RUNNING flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Guenter,

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 07:20:59PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/watchdog.h b/include/linux/watchdog.h
> index b535b02b1d7f..f0292d56caf0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/watchdog.h
> +++ b/include/linux/watchdog.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct watchdog_device {
>  #define WDOG_ALLOW_RELEASE	2	/* Did we receive the magic char ? */
>  #define WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT		3	/* Is 'nowayout' feature set ? */
>  #define WDOG_UNREGISTERED	4	/* Has the device been unregistered */
> +#define WDOG_RUNNING		5	/* True if HW watchdog running */
>  	/* the following variables are for internal use only */
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	unsigned long last_keepalive;
> @@ -124,6 +125,12 @@ static inline bool watchdog_active(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>  	return test_bit(WDOG_ACTIVE, &wdd->status);
>  }
>  
> +/* Use the following function to check whether or not the watchdog is running */

I'd like to have this comment more clear to distinguish between device
state and userspace view. Maybe also call the flag WDOG_HW_RUNNING to
make this more clear?

> +static inline bool watchdog_running(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(WDOG_RUNNING, &wdd->status);
> +}
> +

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux