Re: [PATCH 2/2] keys, trusted: seal with a policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:21:01AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > >  			}
> > >  			break;
> > > +		case Opt_policydigest:
> > > +			if (!tpm2 ||
> > > +			    strlen(args[0].from) != (2 * opt->digest_len))
> > > +				return -EINVAL;
> > > +			kfree(opt->policydigest);
> > > +			opt->policydigest = kzalloc(opt->digest_len,
> > > +						    GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > Is it correct to kfree opt->policydigest here before allocating it?
> 
> I think so. The same option might be encountered multiple times.

This would surely signify an error?


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux