> > (This isn't the worst one, but it just happens to be one of the first.)
> > There are many cases where the typical style would be to declare a new
> > variable at the top of the function, where you perform the
> > macro/function-call to convert from one abstraction to another. Like
> >
> > static int nfc_set_sram_bank(struct atmel_nand_host *host, unsigned int bank)
> > {
> > struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(&hot->nand_chip);
> > ...
> >
> > and then use it later. Can that be done very easily?
> >
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, BANK, ATMEL_HSMC_NFC_BANK1);
> > > } else {
> >
> > ...
>
> Honestly, I don't know how to do that with a coccinelle script, and it
> will probably take me more time to find how to do it than addressing
> those problems manually.
>
> Julia, could you give us some hint?
Probably something like the following would be easiest. You can just run
it after your other transformations:
@r exists@
identifier f;
expression e;
@@
f(...) { <+... nand_to_mtd(e) ...+> }
@@
identifier r.f;
expression r.e;
@@
f(...) {
+ struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(e);
...
}
This won't work if there is more than one possible value of e. If that is
likely, then I could come up with something more complex. It also assumes
that you want to convert all such calls. If you only want to convert calls
that occur in a particular context, eg a field reference, then you could
enhance the pattern inside the <+... ...+> in the first rule.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
