Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] fpga: add bindings document for simple fpga bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:09 PM,  <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> New bindings document for simple fpga bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v9:  initial version added to this patchset
> v10: s/fpga/FPGA/g
>      replace DT overlay example with slightly more complicated example
>      move to staging/simple-fpga-bus
> v11: No change in this patch for v11 of the patch set
> v12: Moved out of staging.
>      Changed to use FPGA bridges framework instead of resets
>      for bridges.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/fpga/simple-fpga-bus.txt   |   81 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/simple-fpga-bus.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/simple-fpga-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/simple-fpga-bus.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2e742f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/simple-fpga-bus.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +Simple FPGA Bus
> +===============
> +
> +A Simple FPGA Bus is a bus that handles configuring an FPGA and its bridges
> +before populating the devices below its node.  All this happens when a device
> +tree overlay is added to the live tree.  This document describes that device
> +tree overlay.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : should contain "simple-fpga-bus"
> +- #address-cells, #size-cells, ranges: must be present to handle address space
> +  mapping for children.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- fpga-mgr : should contain a phandle to a FPGA manager.
> +- fpga-firmware : should contain the name of a FPGA image file located on the
> +  firmware search path.

Putting firmware filename in DT has come up in other cases recently[1]
and we concluded it should not be in the DT. Maybe the conclusion
would be different here, and if so we should have a common property
here.

> +- partial-reconfig : boolean property should be defined if partial
> +  reconfiguration of the FPGA is to be done, otherwise full reconfiguration
> +  is done.
> +- fpga-bridges : should contain a list of bridges that the bus will disable
> +  before   programming the FPGA and then enable after the FPGA has been
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +/ {
> +       fragment@0 {
> +               target-path="/soc";
> +               __overlay__ {
> +                       #address-cells = <1>;
> +                       #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +                       bridge@0xff200000 {
> +                               compatible = "simple-fpga-bus";
> +                               reg = <0xc0000000 0x20000000>,
> +                                     <0xff200000 0x00200000>;

You have registers for the bus, so therefore it is not simple. I think
the bus or bridge needs a specific compatible

Rob

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg92462.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux