Luis R. Rodriguez writes ("Wiki for automatic reports / fixes"):
[...]
> While discussing expectations and information about
> reports over these with Valentin it occurred to me information about
> all these may be scattered separately and some developers may be
> surprised when they first get reports / fixes from these sorts of
> testing systems and that perhaps it may be useful if we had a single
> wiki entry point where we could refer folks to the different ongoing
> testing infrastructures out there working upstream.
>
> If we could piggy back off of an already existing wiki then great, but
> if not I was thinking something off of wiki.kernel.org might be good.
> How about tests.wiki.kernel.org ? If such projects don't have a wiki
> they could perhaps use pages off of tests.wiki.kernel.org to elaborate
> and set expectations straight. Thoughts?
To clarify what I think you are suggesting, is to create a new wiki or
wiki page which gives information about automatic tests that are
performed on upstream (or going-upstream) Linux branches ?
I think this is a good idea. I'm not sure how much information we
need for each tester, but a page for each would be about right.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
