Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] watchdog: Always evaluate new timeout against min_timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:27:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Up to now, a new timeout value is only evaluated against min_timeout
> if max_timeout is provided. This does not really make sense; a driver
> can have a minimum timeout even if it does not have a maximum timeout.
> Ensure that it is not smaller than min_timeout, even if max_timeout
> is not set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux