On 08/09/2015 13:22, Parav Pandit wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Haggai Eran <haggaie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2015 23:38, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>> +static void init_ucontext_lists(struct ib_ucontext *ucontext)
>>> +{
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->pd_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->mr_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->mw_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->cq_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->qp_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->srq_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->ah_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->xrcd_list);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ucontext->rule_list);
>>> +}
>>
>> I don't see how this change is related to the patch.
>
> Its not but code which I added makes this function to grow longer, so
> to keep it to same readability level, I did the cleanup.
> May be I can send separate patch for cleanup?
Sounds good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
