On 08/09/2015 10:04, Parav Pandit wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Haggai Eran <haggaie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 07/09/2015 23:38, Parav Pandit wrote: >>> @@ -2676,7 +2686,7 @@ static inline int thread_group_empty(struct task_struct *p) >>> * Protects ->fs, ->files, ->mm, ->group_info, ->comm, keyring >>> * subscriptions and synchronises with wait4(). Also used in procfs. Also >>> * pins the final release of task.io_context. Also protects ->cpuset and >>> - * ->cgroup.subsys[]. And ->vfork_done. >>> + * ->cgroup.subsys[]. Also projtects ->vfork_done and ->rdma_res_counter. >> s/projtects/protects/ >>> * >>> * Nests both inside and outside of read_lock(&tasklist_lock). >>> * It must not be nested with write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock), >> > > Hi Haggai Eran, > Did you miss to put comments or I missed something? Yes, I wrote "s/projtects/protects/" to tell you that you have a typo in your comment. You should change the word "projtects" to "protects". Haggai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
