On 08/05/15 19:54, NeilBrown wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:41:52 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> On 07/24/15 17:28, NeilBrown wrote: >>> >> >> Hi Neil, >> >> Some edits for you to consider. > > Wow, thanks. I think I agree with all ... had to do some research for > "neither is" though. > >> >>> +However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that. If >>> +RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected >>> +structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a-priori >> >> no hyphen: ^ > > Do you have an opinion on where I should but "a priori" in italics? > I feel there needs to be something to make it clear the "a" is not an > English "a". I don't think that italics are needed for that. > Jon: do you want an incremental patch, or a resend? -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
