On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:21:54AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> I like this, it's a good description of both options. I'm still biased >> about the approach: I prefer flags, since pointers to user structures >> complicate syscall filtering. ;) > > Seems like we should do two things to make that easier: > > 1) Create a standardized kernel mechanism for parameter-struct handling, > implementing the recommendations mentioned here. It's been suggested in the past that nlmsg is appropriate for such a thing, but I remain suspicious. :) > 2) Integrate into that mechanism a way to filter the resulting parameter > struct with BPF *after* it has been copied to kernel space (and thus > can no longer be tampered with). Yeah, this is a irritating part: the structures operated on are copied from userspace adhoc in each syscall. Doing argument checking would mean double copies initially, and perhaps teaching syscalls about optional "already copied" arguments or something as an optimization. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
