On 07/09, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:07:42 -0700 > Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 07/08/2015 02:00 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:57:48 -0700 > > > Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> On 07/07, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > >>> > > >>> } else { > > >>> pr_err("clk: clk_composite_determine_rate function called, but no mux or rate callback set!\n"); > > >>> + req->rate = 0; > > >>> return 0; > > >> Shouldn't this return an error now? And then assigning req->rate > > >> wouldn't be necessary. Sorry I must have missed this last round. > > >> > > > Actually I wanted to keep the existing behavior: return a 0 rate (not > > > an error) when there is no mux or rate ops. > > > > > > That's something we can change afterwards, but it might reveals > > > new bugs if some users are checking for a 0 rate to detect errors. > > > > > > > Ok. Care to send the patch now to do that while we're thinking about it? > > We can test it out for a month or two. > > > > Here is a patch modifying a few drivers to return errors instead of a 0 > rate. Feel free to squash it in the previous one if you think this is > better. > > Best Regards, > > Boris > > --- >8 --- > > From dca9c28301042cf19dad4b1e4555cdb7c1063745 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:20:21 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] clk: fix some determine_rate implementations > > Some determine_rate implementations are not returning an error when then > failed to adapt the rate according to the rate request. > Fix them so that they return an error instead of silently returning 0. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> The linewrap is seriously messed up here. Please fix your mailer next time. I had to hand edit the patch to get it to apply. I've applied this in top of the original patch as a different commit, in case we need to revert it later. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html