On 11 June 2015 at 08:22, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fu Wei wrote: >> >> If we make the first stage timeout is timeout/2, this violates the >> definition of timeout. > > > The documentation says that the hardware needs to reset after the timeout > expires. yes , you are absolutely on this. Great thanks for point out this. my patch is doing this way: trigger WS1 at the timeout expires Before that, using pretimeout for WS0 as an warning. > If you program the hardware to timeout/2, the driver can ignore > WS0 and allow WS1 to reset the hardware. That conforms to the > documentation. yes, technically we can do nothing in WS0, and just wait for WS1. So SBSA watchdog become a one stage timeout watchdog, right? So if user want the WS0 warning, How to make driver know that, and do something in WS0 routine? I think by this way, two stage timeouts, WS0 "alert" will be meaningless. Could you suggest a good way to use WS0, so we can follow SBSA spec? > > -- > Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the > Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
