Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/04/2015 09:28 AM, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The Arria10 SOC uses a completely different SDRAM controller from the
> earlier CycloneV and ArriaV SoCs. This patch abstracts the SDRAM bits
> for the CycloneV/ArriaV SoCs in preparation for the Arria10 support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Make c5_data static.
> ---
>  drivers/edac/altera_edac.c |  194 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  drivers/edac/altera_edac.h |  116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/edac/altera_edac.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index a9e7c69..a8350f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c

What branch are you basing this patch on? I get the following error when
applied to both v4.1-rc6, linux-next, and linux-edac/linux-next.

Applying: edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
error: patch failed: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:400
error: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.

Dinh



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux