Hi Guenter, On 25 May 2015 at 01:47, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> >> The pseudo-code in the specification suggests that if WCV is configured, >> WS0 = WCV >> WS1 = WCV + WOR >> >> Assuming that the implementation follows the pseudo-code in the >> specification, >> we would have separately programmable values. Since the pretimeout (per >> ABI) >> is the difference in seconds to the timeout, and not an absolute value, >> we would have to program the registers as follows. >> >> WCV = timeout - pretimeout; >> WOR = pretimeout; >> >> Does this make sense ? And actually all the patchset I sent to upstream are all follow this design, and have been test on Foundation model and Seattle B0 > > > Yes, thank you. I will test this on my hardware. > > > -- > Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the > Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
