On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:52:06 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:55:45 +0200 > Antonio Ospite <ao2@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > with this set I am proposing fixes for minor issues I found in some > > comments when reading through the code. > > > > I am sending this to linux-doc because I consider these documentation > > fixes. > > The fixes all seem fine to me. For this kind of stuff, though, they > really should go to the maintainers in charge of the specific files being > changed. I can't really take stuff outside the documentation tree without > explicit acks — taking stuff *in* Documentation/ is fraught enough! :) > It's pretty clear my laziness played a role here. I guess I can split patch 2 and send the pieces to the appropriate recipients. Patches 1 and 3 should be OK: the maintainers in charge of the touched files are in CC already and can ACK if they approve. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
